how much does kiro cost per month

Kiro is free with 50 credits per month, Pro is $20/mo for 1,000 credits, Pro+ is $40/mo, Pro Max is $100/mo, and Power is $200/mo, with extra credits at $0.04 each. Atlas is free and open source; you bring your own model keys.

why do kiro credits run out so fast

A Kiro spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run, so the spec-driven workflow Kiro is built around drains Pro's 1,000 credits quickly. Atlas has no credits: it is free and open source and bills only through your model provider.

can kiro use openai or gemini models

No. Kiro model choice is Bedrock-bound to Claude and open-weight models, with no OpenAI or Gemini option. Atlas lets you switch the active model and provider on the fly with favorites and recents using your own keys.

what is ears notation in kiro

EARS notation is the structured requirements format Kiro writes before producing a design, a task list, and code. Atlas skips formal notation and instead drafts a plan in a read-only plan agent, asking before switching to a build agent.

does kiro replace the amazon q developer cli

Yes. Kiro is AWS's spec-driven IDE and CLI, and it supersedes the Amazon Q Developer CLI. Atlas is an independent open source terminal agent with no cloud provider affiliation.

atlas vs kiro for blocking dangerous tool calls

Kiro uses agent hooks, where a PreToolUse hook returning exit code 2 blocks the tool call outright. Atlas uses declarative rules: every Atlas tool call is permission-gated against allow, ask, and deny rules before it runs, with no script to write.

is kiro worth it for small bug fixes

Probably not. Kiro's own weakness is that the spec ceremony is heavy overhead for small tasks, and a spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run. Atlas gives plan-then-diff review at any task size for free.

Atlas vs Kiro in 2026: Terminal Agent Compared to AWS's Spec-Driven IDE and CLI

Atlas and Kiro disagree about how much ceremony a code change deserves in 2026. Atlas is a terminal-native AI coding agent, free and open source, bring your own model keys, that drafts a plan in a read-only plan agent and computes a unified diff for every file edit before writing. Kiro is AWS's spec-driven IDE and CLI, superseding the Amazon Q Developer CLI, which writes requirements in EARS notation, then a design, then a task list, before generating any code. Kiro charges credits: Free gives 50 per month, Pro is $20/mo for 1,000.

Spec Ceremony: EARS Notation vs the Atlas Read-Only Plan Agent

Kiro's spec-driven workflow writes requirements in EARS notation, then a design, then tasks, before code, and a spec run costs roughly 5 times a vibe-mode run. Atlas plans without the paperwork: Atlas drafts a plan in a read-only plan agent and asks before switching to a build agent, so nothing is written until you agree.

Both Atlas and Kiro refuse to let a model write code from a one-line prompt, but they refuse differently. Kiro produces a formal artifact chain: EARS-notation requirements, then a design document, then a task list, and only then code. That chain is auditable and genuinely valuable on a large feature with real stakeholders. Kiro's own acknowledged weakness is that the spec ceremony is heavy overhead for small tasks. Atlas keeps the intent and drops the artifacts. Atlas drafts a plan in a read-only plan agent, which cannot touch files, and asks before switching to a build agent. You get the think-before-you-write discipline on a two-line fix as well as on a two-week feature, without producing an EARS requirements document to change a regex.

Credit Economics: Kiro's 1,000 Credits vs Free and Open Source

Kiro's credit economics punish its own flagship feature: a spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run, so Pro's 1,000 credits at $20/mo drain fast, with extra credits at $0.04 each. Atlas is free and open source, bring your own model keys, so there is no credit meter.

Kiro's pricing ladder runs Free with 50 credits per month, Pro $20/mo for 1,000 credits, Pro+ $40/mo, Pro Max $100/mo, and Power $200/mo, with extra credits at $0.04 each. The awkward part is the incentive: because a spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run, the disciplined workflow AWS built Kiro around is the expensive one, and the cheap path is the one Kiro implicitly argues against. Atlas has no such tension. Atlas is free and open source, bring your own model keys, so planning is not a billable event, and Atlas lets you switch the active model and provider on the fly with favorites and recents, which means you can spend on the model that deserves it rather than on credits priced by the vendor.

Model Choice: Bedrock-Bound Kiro vs Bring Your Own Keys

Kiro model choice is Bedrock-bound to Claude and open-weight models, with no OpenAI or Gemini option in 2026. Atlas puts the roster in your hands: Atlas is free and open source, bring your own model keys, and Atlas lets you switch the active model and provider on the fly with favorites and recents.

Being an AWS product, Kiro routes through Bedrock, and that ties the model roster to Claude and open-weight models with no OpenAI or Gemini option. If your organization has standardized on Bedrock, that is a feature, and the billing consolidates. If you have a favorite model outside it, that is a wall. Atlas has no roster to be constrained by: you supply keys, Atlas drives whichever provider they belong to, and you change the active model mid-session through favorites and recents. That flexibility compounds with the Atlas retrieval layer, since Atlas searches code with hybrid semantic and keyword retrieval fused by reciprocal rank fusion and indexes by AST declarations using tree-sitter, giving whichever model you pick better context than a raw file dump.

Change Review and Safety: Kiro Hooks vs Atlas Permission Rules

Kiro agent hooks fire on events, and a PreToolUse hook returning exit code 2 blocks the tool call outright, with checkpointing on every agent action. Atlas gates by rule rather than by script: every Atlas tool call is permission-gated against allow, ask, and deny rules before it runs.

Kiro and Atlas both stop a bad tool call, and the mechanisms are worth comparing directly. Kiro gives you hooks: a PreToolUse hook that returns exit code 2 blocks the tool call, which is powerful and requires you to write and maintain the script. Atlas gives you declarative rules. Every Atlas tool call is permission-gated against allow, ask, and deny rules before it runs, and no scripting is needed to get a safe default. Atlas computes a unified diff for every file edit and surfaces it for approval before writing, and Atlas snapshots file changes as git patches so edits can be diffed and rolled back, which answers Kiro's checkpointing with plain git. For teams that want programmable enforcement, Atlas is extensible through plugins that contribute tools and hook into agent lifecycle events.

Verification Evidence: Property-Based Testing vs Local Test Runs

Kiro property-based testing extracts properties from the spec and runs hundreds of randomized cases as verification evidence, the strongest 2026 argument for the EARS spec chain. Atlas verifies in your shell instead, running your real test suite with every tool call permission-gated against allow, ask, and deny rules before it executes.

Kiro's property-based testing is the payoff for the spec ceremony: once requirements exist in EARS notation, properties can be extracted from them and exercised across hundreds of randomized cases, producing verification evidence a reviewer can actually read. Atlas offers nothing equivalent, and that is a fair point for Kiro. What Atlas offers is proximity to your existing verification. Atlas is a terminal-native TUI that runs in your shell, so it runs the same test command your CI runs, against the same local environment. Atlas fans out work to subagents that can run in the foreground or in parallel background sessions, which shortens long verification loops, and Atlas reads git branches, status, and diffs, and can stage and create commits on your behalf once the suite is green.

Project Conventions: Steering Files vs Plugins and MCP

Kiro steering files carry project conventions across 2 surfaces, the IDE and the Kiro CLI, giving a single source of truth for how a team writes code. Atlas carries conventions through extension points: Atlas is extensible through plugins that contribute tools and hook into agent lifecycle events, and Atlas connects to Model Context Protocol servers.

Convention plumbing is where Kiro's dual-surface design shows its value: steering files apply in both the Kiro IDE and the Kiro CLI, so a rule written once holds wherever the agent runs. Atlas has one surface, the terminal, and grows through sockets rather than surfaces. Atlas connects to Model Context Protocol servers and exposes their tools to the agent, so a house linter, a ticket system, or an internal service becomes a tool the agent can call. Atlas is extensible through plugins that contribute tools and hook into agent lifecycle events, which is where a team encodes its own rules. Atlas also ships a TUI theme system with a charcoal-and-blue default theme and many presets, so the shared surface is at least a pleasant one.

How to choose

Choose Atlas if

You want plan-then-build discipline without EARS notation, since the Kiro spec ceremony is heavy overhead for small tasks.
You refuse credit metering, because a Kiro spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run and Pro's 1,000 credits drain fast.
You want OpenAI or Gemini models, which Kiro cannot offer because its model choice is Bedrock-bound.
You want safety by default rather than by script, with every tool call gated against allow, ask, and deny rules.
You want a free, open source single binary rather than a $20/mo to $200/mo subscription ladder.

Choose the alternative if

You want a formal artifact chain: EARS-notation requirements, then a design, then tasks, before any code.
You want property-based testing that extracts properties from the spec and runs hundreds of randomized cases as evidence.
You want programmable enforcement where a PreToolUse hook returning exit code 2 blocks the tool call outright.
You want steering files carrying project conventions across both an IDE and a CLI, with checkpointing on every agent action.
You are standardized on AWS Bedrock and want Claude and open-weight models billed there.

Frequently asked questions

how much does kiro cost per month: Kiro is free with 50 credits per month, Pro is $20/mo for 1,000 credits, Pro+ is $40/mo, Pro Max is $100/mo, and Power is $200/mo, with extra credits at $0.04 each. Atlas is free and open source; you bring your own model keys.
why do kiro credits run out so fast: A Kiro spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run, so the spec-driven workflow Kiro is built around drains Pro's 1,000 credits quickly. Atlas has no credits: it is free and open source and bills only through your model provider.
can kiro use openai or gemini models: No. Kiro model choice is Bedrock-bound to Claude and open-weight models, with no OpenAI or Gemini option. Atlas lets you switch the active model and provider on the fly with favorites and recents using your own keys.
what is ears notation in kiro: EARS notation is the structured requirements format Kiro writes before producing a design, a task list, and code. Atlas skips formal notation and instead drafts a plan in a read-only plan agent, asking before switching to a build agent.
does kiro replace the amazon q developer cli: Yes. Kiro is AWS's spec-driven IDE and CLI, and it supersedes the Amazon Q Developer CLI. Atlas is an independent open source terminal agent with no cloud provider affiliation.
atlas vs kiro for blocking dangerous tool calls: Kiro uses agent hooks, where a PreToolUse hook returning exit code 2 blocks the tool call outright. Atlas uses declarative rules: every Atlas tool call is permission-gated against allow, ask, and deny rules before it runs, with no script to write.
is kiro worth it for small bug fixes: Probably not. Kiro's own weakness is that the spec ceremony is heavy overhead for small tasks, and a spec run costs roughly five times a vibe-mode run. Atlas gives plan-then-diff review at any task size for free.

Try Atlas in your terminal

The terminal-native AI coding agent. Free core, single binary.

Install Atlas

Sources

Kiro official site (kiro.dev)
Kiro documentation (kiro.dev)

Related guides

Atlas: The Best Terminal-Native AI Coding Agent Alternative to Kiro in 2026

Discover Atlas, the terminal-native AI coding agent, as a powerful alternative to Kiro in 2026. Enjoy cost-effective, local-first development with granular control and extensibility.

Atlas with Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: The $0.248 per Mtok Workhorse of 2026

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B is the cheapest reasoning model in the Qwen3.6 line at $0.248 per Mtok input and $1.485 per Mtok output, with a full 256K tokens (262,144) context for Atlas.

Atlas with Baseten in 2026: 262,000 Tokens In, 262,000 Tokens Out

Atlas with Baseten in 2026: Kimi K2.7 Code at 262,000 tokens in and 262,000 out, GPT OSS 120B at $0.10/$0.50 per Mtok, and the tradeoffs of dedicated hosting.

Atlas for Erlang in 2026

Atlas is a terminal-native AI coding agent for Erlang/OTP in 2026. Run it in an app with a rebar.config, map supervisors and gen_server modules, review every diff.

Atlas with IBM Granite Code 20B (Ollama): More Capacity, Less Window in 2026

IBM Granite Code 20B (Ollama) is 12GB on disk and Free (self-hosted), but the 20b tag drops to 8K tokens (8,192) where the 8B instruct advertises 125K.

Atlas with Claude Sonnet 4.5: The First 1M Token Claude in 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.5 gives Atlas a 1M token window at $3 per Mtok input, $15 per Mtok output. Setup, the 64K output ceiling, and when Sonnet 5 is the better pin.

Atlas with Qwen2.5 72B (local via Ollama): Air-Gapped Coding in 2026

Run Atlas fully offline on Qwen2.5 72B (local via Ollama) in 2026. Free (self-hosted), about 47 GB at Q4_K_M, and a 32,768 token local context cap.

Atlas with GPT-5 Nano: The Cheapest Model in the OpenAI Registry in 2026

GPT-5 Nano in Atlas: $0.05 per Mtok input and $0.40 per Mtok output, the cheapest model in the OpenAI registry, and the right pick for the small_model slot.

Browse this resource hub